RUDOLPH LUDAWAY, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Young v. Levy, 140 So. 3d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …s to Levy through a writ of garnishment. “On appeal, this court reviews a trial court’s application of a statute de novo and any of the trial court’s findings of fact under the competent substantial evidence standard of review.” Chackal v. Staples, 991 So. 2d 949, 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Young asserts that the trial court erred in allowing Levy to satisfy her attorneys’ fees judgment by obtaining a writ of garnishment against Young’s distributions from the company. Young asserts the plain language of secti…
• McDADE v. State, 114 So. 3d 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
  …that he had the initial burden of proof.3 Typically, we would review the trial court’s application of the statute de novo and the court’s findings of fact to determine if they are supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Chackal v. Staples, 991 So. 2d 949, 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). But see O’Brien v. O’Brien, 899 So. 2d 1133, 1137-38 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (reviewing the trial court’s decision to exclude electronic communications under section 934.03 for an abuse of discretion). However, because the fact…
• Blok Builders, LLC v. Katryniok, 245 So. 3d 779 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
  …directed to the representation of BellSouth.3 LEVINE, J., and BUCHANAN, LAURIE E., Associate Judge, concur. "Appurtenances are things belonging to another thing as principal and which pass as incident to the principal thing." Chackal v. Staples , 991 So. 2d 949, 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting Trask v. Moore , 24 Cal. 2d 365, 368, 149 P. 2d 854, 856 (1944) ). While Blok suggests that these lines are appurtenances to the adjacent homes, they are not, as they would not "pass as incident to the principal thi…