LEON RALPH JAMES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1977-12-09
No. 77-562
GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
364 So. 2d 729 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Brooks v. State, 349 So. 2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Therefore, we remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Vitaliano E. Napoles v. State, 470 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
    …remanded to the trial court with directions to modify the sentence in compliance with the above statute. The defendant need not be present in court for this correction of sentence. Pruitt v. State, 363 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); James v. State, 364 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Affirmed as modified and remanded.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw