BANK OF AMERICA, APPELLANT,

v.

RETA BUTLER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Bank OF Am. v. Asbury, 165 So. 3d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
  …n this matter. Although Asbury filed a motion challenging Bank of America’s standing, the trial court never addressed standing or ruled on As-bury’s motion.- Accordingly, we do not consider that issue in this appeal. See Hamilton v. R.L. Best Int’l, 996 So. 2d 233, 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding that the preservation of error for appellate review is not completed until the aggrieved party has obtained a ruling on the motion in the lower tribunal). . Asbury’s response in her answer of "without knowledge” is…
• Hentze v. Cherolyn Janel Denys, 88 So. 3d 307 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …ling to apply statutory interest first appears in its final order. “If the error is one that first appears in the final order, the aggrieved party must bring it to the judge’s attention by filing a motion for rehearing.” Hamilton v. R.L. Best Intl., 996 So. 2d 233, 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Although the former husband did file a motion for rehearing, it did not address the issue of statutory interest. The former husband next argues the trial court improperly modified child support when it failed to impute inc…
• Holland v. Cheney Bros., Inc., 22 So. 3d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
  …d. at 366. When “the issue ... arises for the first time in the final order” or “[i]f the error is one that first appears in the final order,” an objection must be preserved by filing a motion for rehearing on the issue. Hamilton v. R.L. Best Int’l, 996 So. 2d 233, 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). The very purpose of a motion for rehearing is to allow the JCC, the sole finder of fact and arbiter of law, the opportunity to consider, correct, and clarify any perceived errors, whether factual or legal, before an order…

Authorities Cited

• Evans v. State, 777 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
• Dyer v. Beverly & Tittle, P.A., 777 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)