THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

OMAR B. SOTO, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Pastore v. Pastore, 497 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 1986)
  …arty as tenants in common, section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1985); Ball v. Ball, 335 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1976), we find the general rule that the paying party in such a situation is entitled to credit for his expenditures on the home, Strollo v. Strollo, 365 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), inapplicable to this case. The trial court explicitly imposed the duty of making these payments upon the husband as a form of “unallocated child support and alimony.” An examination of the circumstances of the case at bar well…
• Cannon v. Morris, 407 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
  …l home. It restores to the [*374] spouse out of possession a right to immediate possession and concomitant with that right, the right to seek a partitioning of the property. Lambert v. Lambert, 403 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Strollo v. Strollo, 365 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Therefore, we reverse the summary judgment. Regarding the award of attorney’s fees, Section 64.081, Florida Statutes, provides for an award of attorney’s fees in a partitioning action, but it is improper to award fees pursuant…
• Manuel E. Abella-Fernandez, M.D. v. Abella, 393 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …d. This would leave the former husband the obligation to provide shelter and habitation for ex-wife’s new spouse. Such a ruling has no basis in law and is indeed a frustrating and pernicious rule to visit upon the former husband. Strollo v. Strollo, 365 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Jones v. Jones, supra; Hendricks v. Hendricks, 312 So. 2d 792 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). Consequently, this aspect of the judgment should be deleted. Except as modified by this decision, the judgment is affirmed with directions to ent…