E.P., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2008-12-31
No. 3D07-2879
Before COPE and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
997 So. 2d 1240 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2008) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases


Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

In this appeal from an adjudication of delinquency, no error has been demonstrated in the denial of a motion to suppress drug paraphernalia found on the juvenile’s person after a pat down which followed a Terry stop justified under section 984.13, Florida Statutes (2007) (“when the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the child is absent from school without authorization ... for the purpose of delivering the child without unreasonable delay to the appropriate school system site”), see K.A.C. v. State, 707 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and justifiably preceded placing him in the police car for the purpose of taking him to school as the statute requires. See, e.g., Jackson v. State, 791 P. 2d 1023 (Alaska Ct.App. 1990)(“in the case of transportation in a police vehicle, however, or in the analogous circumstances here, the necessity of close proximity will itself provide the needed basis for a protective pat-down of the person.”). See also In re Kelsey, 243 Wis.2d 422, 626 N.W. 2d 777 (2001); State v. Evans, 67 Ohio St.3d 405, 618 N.E. 2d 162 (1993).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • L.C. v. State, 23 So. 3d 1215 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
    …to the scene of the crime in the rear of a police car, the police may carry out a departmental policy, imposed for reasons of officer safety, by patting down that person.”); United States v. Burton, 228 F. 3d 524, 528 (4th Cir.2000); E.P. v. State, 997 So. 2d 1240, 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (stating necessity of close proximity in police vehicle itself provides needed basis for pat-down of person); A.J.M. v. State, 746 So. 2d at 1224 (affirming trial court order denying motion to suppress where officer performe…
  • D.O. v. State, 77 So. 3d 787 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
    …a pat-down of the outer clothing of the juvenile, and limited in purpose to locating any weapons on the juvenile’s person. Mention must be made of two decisions of this Court which have, to some extent, addressed the issue at bar. In E.P. v. State, 997 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), we upheld, without further analysis, a pat-down search of a juvenile which “followed a Terry stop justified under section 984.13, Florida Statutes ... and justifiably preceded placing him in the police car for the purpose of taki…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw