JOSEPH C. TAYLOR, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Suzzann Evans Card v. Card, 122 So. 3d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
  …ial court is not foreclosed from considering the charging lien in this action because the issue of attorney’s fees and costs has not been finalized and the trial court reserved jurisdiction for that purpose. See Baker & Hostetler, LLP v. Swearingen, 998 So. 2d 1158, 1163 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (holding that the trial court had jurisdiction to consider a motion to perfect and enforce an attorney’s charging lien where the trial court reserved jurisdiction to determine entitlement and amount of attorney’s fees). A…
• Naftzger v. Elam, 41 So. 3d 944 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …88, 92 n. 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Further, charging liens may be en [*947] forced in cases in which the court dismisses the case pursuant to a settlement but expressly reserves jurisdiction on attorney's fees. See Baker & Hostetler, LLP v. Swearingen, 998 So. 2d 1158, 1163 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).…
• THE Mineo Salcedo LAW Firm. P.A. v. Loly Cesard and Yanite Jean, 333 So. 3d 222 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)
  …rsuant to settlement.’” Levine v. Gonzalez, 901 So. 2d 969, 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (quoting Heller v. Held, 817 So. 2d 1023, 1025–26 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)). Such proper notice is necessary to perfect the lien. Baker & Hostetler, LLP v. Swearingen, 998 So. 2d 1158, 1161 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). The filing of a charging lien typically occurs before the outcome of the case is known unless the trial court reserves jurisdiction to address attorney’s fees. See id. at 1161–62. Here, because the firm filed and pursue…