DEXTER L. THOMAS, APPELLANT,

v.

WALTER A. MCNEIL, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Danice Doganiero v. Doganiero, 106 So. 3d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
  …ered in our review by the trial court’s lack of specific findings on the issue of alimony. First, although the trial court’s determination is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard, its discretion is not without borders. See Udell v. Udell, 998 So. 2d 1168, 1170 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (holding that even in a situation where the trial court has “broad” discretion, such discretion is not unlimited); see also Coltea v. Coltea, 856 So. 2d 1047, 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (holding that in proceedings under chapt…
• Terry v. State, 263 So. 3d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
  …to recreate the record of the September 20 resentencing. We disagree with Appellant’s argument that the trial court did not have case jurisdiction to recreate the record without a relinquishment order 9 from this Court. See Udell v. Udell, 998 So. 2d 1168, 1170 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (“For the edification of the parties and the trial court, we note that the rule [9.200(b)(4)] authorizes — indeed, requires — the lower court’s participation in this process, and no order from this court should be necess…
• Kruse v. Levesque, 192 So. 3d 1263 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …Doganiero v. Doganiero, 106 So. 3d 75, 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Fichtel v. Fichtel, 141 So. 3d 593, 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). However, the trial court’s discretion in this regard is not unlimited. See Doganiero, 106 So. 3d at 78 (citing Udell v. Udell, 998 So. 2d 1168, 1170 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)). The trial court’s detailed findings of fact are critical to our resolution of this case. The trial court found — in accordance -with the prior determination by the Social Security Administration and the other evidence pre…

Authorities Cited

• Green v. Moore, 777 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)