WERKS UNLIMITED, LLC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
GREGORY S. BROWN PROPERTY APPRAISER OF SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA AND ROBERT G. MCCLURE, TAX COLLECTOR FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEES
WERKS UNLIMITED, LLC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
GREGORY S. BROWN PROPERTY APPRAISER OF SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA AND ROBERT G. MCCLURE, TAX COLLECTOR FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEES
999 So. 2d 684
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2008)
Caution
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellants challenge an “Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Entry of Partial Final Judgment” based on the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. We are constrained to REVERSE this ruling and REMAND for further proceedings.
BROWNING, C.J., BARFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
Johnson v. Omega Ins. Co., 200 So. 3d 1207 (Fla. 2016)…plied); De Leon v. Great Am. Assur. Co., 78 So. 3d 585, 591-92 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“[A]ny success- in an action on an insurance policy, let alone the full payment of the asserted claim, requires an award of fees.”); Goff v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co., 999 So. 2d 684, 688 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (policyholder was entitled to attorney’s fees because the insurer only agreed to grant benefits after the action was filed). Moreover, we have held that the bad faith or degree of “wrongfulness” of the insurance company is n…
-
Amado Trinidad v. Fla. Peninsula Ins. Co., 121 So. 3d 433 (Fla. 2013)…POLSTON, C.J., dissenting. Because Trinidad v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Co., 99 So. 3d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), does not expressly and directly conflict with Goff v. State Farm Florida In [*444] surance Co., 999 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), I would discharge this case for lack of jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The express and direct conflict our constitution requires does not exist here. Here, the alleged conflict case, Goff, involves different fa…1 / 2
-
Clifton v. United Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., 31 So. 3d 826 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…was filed following a dispute with the insurer for the legitimate purpose of resolving that dispute. Id. If so, an award of fees was proper regardless of whether the insurer timely paid the appraisal award. See also Goff v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co., 999 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (reversing the denial of the insured’s motion for attorney’s fees when State Farm was aware that the Goffs disputed the settlement offered but did not invoke the appraisal clause until after the Goffs filed suit), review denied, 2…
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence