JAMES R. OLIPHANT, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• State v. Inciarrano, 473 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1985)
  …ing.” (Emphasis added.) From this language, it is clear that the legislature did not intend that every oral communication be free from interception without the prior consent of all the parties to the communication. For example, in Chandler v. State, 366 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 376 So. 2d 1157 (Fla.1979), aff'd, 449 U.S. 560, 101 S.Ct. 802, 66 L.Ed.2d 740 (1981), the district court held that defendants who engaged in an open-air conversation while using commercially sold walkie-talkies or…
• Moreno v. State, 418 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …. Holt v. United States, 342 F. 2d 163 (5th Cir. 1965); Commonwealth v. Keizer, 385 N.E. 2d 1001 (Mass. 1979). Where evidence tends, in any way, even indirectly, to prove a defendant’s innocence, it is error to deny its admission. Chandler v. State, 366 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Watts v. State, 354 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). In Commonwealth v. Keizer, supra, the court permitted defendant to show that crimes of a similar nature had been committed by some other person so closely connected in point of t…
• Maxwell v. State, 443 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 1983)
  …ght to fairness and impartiality. A motion to limit or exclude television coverage must attempt to show with specificity that it will deleteriously affect the trial. See Chandler v. Florida, 449 U.S. 560, 101 S.Ct. 802, 66 L.Ed.2d 740 (1981), aff'g, 366 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 376 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 1979). Appellant concedes that his motion contained only general assertions, but argues that this failure was excusable because trial counsel did not know and could not have known prior to tria…