THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
CHARLES I. WARD, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court granted an attorney's petition to resign from the Florida Bar without eligibility for reinstatement. The respondent sought permanent resignation while facing a three-year suspension, pending disciplinary investigations, and multiple felony convictions. The court approved the resignation as it would not compromise the integrity of the court system or public confidence in the legal profession.
The Court granted the respondent's petition to resign from The Florida Bar without eligibility for reinstatement. The Court found that permitting such resignation would not adversely affect the purity of the court system, hinder the administration of justice, or adversely affect public confidence in the legal profession.
[1] Attorneys may petition for resignation from The Florida Bar without eligibility for reinstatement under the Court's disciplinary authority.
[2] A petition for resignation pending disciplinary proceedings may be granted even if the attorney agrees not to seek reinstatement, notwithstanding rules that contemplate r…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Under our authority to discipline attorneys provided for by Article V, Section 15 of the Florida Constitution, the Court has for consideration the respondent's petition for permission to resign from The Florida Bar without eligibility to seek reinstatement.”
Establishes the Court's constitutional authority and the nature of the matter before it.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRespondent Charles I. Ward was suspended from practice for three years by the Court's February 7, 1978 order. A grievance committee found probable cau…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Resignation Pending Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Under our authority to discipline attorneys provided for by Article V, Section 15 of the Florida Constitution, the Court has for consideration the respondent’s petition for permission to resign from The Florida Bar without eligibility to seek reinstatement.1
By this Court’s order of February 7,1978, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law for three years and thereafter until he could establish rehabilitation.
The respondent’s petition makes reference to his suspension, to a grievance committee report finding probable cause to complain of his failure to account to a client or proper authorities for $300,000, and to pending investigations by the Bar into ten other complaints against him. The petition also lists various civil actions that have been instituted against the respondent, and notes his convictions in five recent felony prosecutions.
In his petition to resign permanently the respondent acknowledges the ruling of this Court that, although the rule on resignation pending disciplinary proceedings contemplates that a resigning attorney may seek reinstatement,2 he will be bound by an agreement not to do so.3
The Florida Bar in response submits that to grant the petition would not adversely affect the purity of the court system, hinder the administration of justice, or adversely affect the confidence of the public in the legal profession.4
Accordingly, it is adjudged that the respondent’s petition to resign from The Flor ida Bar without eligibility for reinstatement is granted.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, Acting C. J., and OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. . Fla.Bar Integr.Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.08.
. Fla.Bar Integr.Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.08(5).
. The Florida Bar, Re Leon H. Brush, 358 So. 2d 1355 (Fla.1978).
. Fla.Bar Integr.Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.08(3).