STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
DOROTHY APPELBAUM, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1979-01-04
No. 53828
ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur., SUNDBERG, J., dissents.
366 So. 2d 443 Florida Supreme Court (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases


Opinion of the Court
OVERTON, Justice.

OVERTON, Justice.

This case is before us on direct appeal from the County Court, Dade County, which held that Section 849.093, Florida Statutes (1977), was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution.

The statute invalidated below regulates the conduct of bingo and guest games. We have recently considered its constitutionality and held that it does not violate the due process and equal protection clauses of the Florida and United States Constitutions. Carroll v. State, 361 So. 2d 144 (Fla.1978).

Although not all of the arguments raised by the appellant were discussed in Carroll, supra, we find the additional arguments to be without merit and specifically find the statute is neither vague nor overbroad.

Accordingly, the decision of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. SUNDBERG, J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …irreconcilable conflict with the decision in General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co., 388 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). See also American Baseball Cap, Inc. v. Duzinski, 359 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. discharged, 366 So. 2d 443 (Fla.1979). Nevertheless, we do not believe that Section 48.181 was intended to permit a manufacturer to promote and sell its products in Florida and be subject to the jurisdiction of Florida courts only when it sells directly to a Florida enterpris…
  • LAW Offs. OF Evan I. Fetterman v. Inter-Tel Inc., 480 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
    …he product or the purchaser of the product in Florida, there was nothing on which the long arm statute could operate. To the same effect is the holding in American Baseball Cap, Inc. v. Duzinski, 359 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. discharged, 366 So. 2d 443 (Fla.1979), involving analysis of subsections (1) and (3) of section 48.181, Florida Statutes, where the court found that lack of control over both the product and its Florida handler was fatal to long arm jurisdiction. Lack of control over a sole d…
  • Gen. Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hickory Springs Mfg. Co., 388 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
    …of this foreign corporation in this state, we cannot reach the question of whether or not this foreign corporation was doing business in this state. See also American Baseball Cap Inc. v. Duzinski, 359 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 366 So. 2d 443 (Fla.1979). Appellants failed to show any connection between appellee’s business activities in Florida and the cause of action and therefore the court was correct in dismissing Hickory Springs as a party defendant. DAUKSCH, C. J., and COBB, J., co…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw