JACKIE GLEASON, APPELLANT,
v.
LEADERSHIP HOUSING, INC., APPELLEE
JACKIE GLEASON, APPELLANT,
LEADERSHIP HOUSING, INC., APPELLEE
366 So. 2d 476
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1979)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This case was previously reviewed by this court in 327 So. 2d 101. Upon remand, the parties presented evidence going to the question of appellant’s damages and the trial court found that the February 15, 1972, value of the 16.8 acres of land on February 15, 1972, the pertinent date in question, together with interest, was $68,-053.44.
We have considered the four points which appellant raised on this appeal and find that reversible error has not been demonstrated.
Accordingly, the order appealed from is affirmed.
DOWNEY, C. J, BERANEK, J.,'and KAPNER, LEWIS, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Moorman v. Am. Safety Equip., 594 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…m, 404 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), we held that errors of form or consistency must be raised on the spot, even though it might be to a party’s benefit to remain silent and later seek a new trial. See also Department of Transportation v. Denmark, 366 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), and Lindquist v. Covert, 279 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), to the same effect. In Robbins, Judge Stone explained that: This principle is founded on the concept of fundamental fairness. Relitigation would deprive the appellants…
-
Cowart v. Kendall United Methodist Church & Atl. Mut. Ins. Co., 476 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…ary to each other — a contradiction which could obviously be resolved, one way or the other, if an objection is raised when the verdicts are returned so that the jury may reconsider the case as a whole. State Department of Transportation v. Denmark, 366 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Lindquist v. Covert, 279 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Wiggs & Maale Construction Co. v. Harris, 348 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); see Higbee v. Dorigo, 66 So. 2d 684 (Fla.1953). We held in Savoca that, because plaintiffs’ co…
-
Smith v. Smith, 378 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…(Fla. 1st DCA 1972). But, again, neither of these situations — nor any equivalent one — was shown to exist in this case. Thus we adopt and apply the suggestion in the specially concurring opinion of the present writer in Martin v. Martin, supra, at 366 So. 2d 476, that [E]vidence [of adultery may not] be employed merely to decrease or enhance an award by way of punishment for conduct of which the court may disapprove, when that conduct is not related to the equitable considerations with which dissolution co…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wedgeworth v. State, 327 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
- Gleason v. Leadership Hous., Inc., 327 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)