STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHNNY WARDLOW, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1979-01-19
No. 78-1511
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur.
366 So. 2d 508 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1979)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The State appeals a trial court's dismissal of a felony food stamp fraud charge against Johnny Wardlow. The court reverses, holding that two separate emergency food stamp applications filed on consecutive days in February 1977 must be aggregated to reach the $200 threshold for felony liability under Florida law.


Holding

The court held that the two applications constitute separate and distinct applications and must be aggregated. The stipulated facts established that Wardlow fraudulently sought or received $248 worth of food stamps ($198 from application E192 and $50 from application E450), satisfying the $200 threshold for felony liability.


Headnotes

[1] Separate applications for food stamp benefits, even if filed close in time, are distinct for the purpose of aggregating the value of benefits sought or received under Flo…

[2] When determining whether the value of fraudulently sought or received food stamps reaches the felony threshold, amounts from separate applications must be added together.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“This statement of facts allows the conclusion that application E450 on February 10 (under which $50 worth of food stamps was received) was neither a part of nor in lieu of application E192 for $198 worth of stamps on February 9. The two applications would thereupon be separate and distinct applications in every way and the $198 sought and the $50 received become separate amounts which must be added together.”

Establishes the court's reasoning that the two applications are separate and must be aggregated for determining the offense level

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

On February 9, 1977, Wardlow applied for emergency food stamps listing his address as 348 Michigan Court and was approved for $198 in benefits, though…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
OTT, Judge.

OTT, Judge.

The state filed an information charging appellee, Johnny Wardlow, with a felony violation of § 409.325, Fla.Stat. (1977) which prohibits food stamp fraud. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the information and the trial court granted the motion.1 We reverse.

Section 409.325 provides that if a person fraudulently seeks or receives less than $200 worth of food stamps in a one year period, he is guilty of a misdemeanor, but if he fraudulently seeks or receives $200 or more worth of food stamps within one year he is guilty of a felony.2 Based upon a stipulated statement of facts the lower court decided that appellee had sought or received only $198 worth of food stamps and so could not be charged with a felony violation of § 409.325.

The pertinent portion of the stipulated statement of facts was as follows:

On February 9, 1977 the defendant went to the Food Stamp Office in Fort Myers, Lee County, Florida and filed for and signed an application for Emergency Food Stamp Benefits. The application is numbered E192 and a certified copy is attached hereto and made part of the record as Exhibit A. The Emergency Food Stamp application E192 shows the defendant’s address as 348 Michigan Court, Fort Myers; the defendant as the head of the household that includes four dependents in addition to his wife, Latricia; and that he or his family members were not certified regular food stamp clients. The application shows it was approved. According to testimony of witnesses, the defendant was eligible for a total of $198.00 in benefits. These funds were never issued. Another Emergency Food Stamp worker, Kathy McQue had another Emergency Food Stamp claimant who filed for and signed an application for Emergency Food Stamps listing the same address as the defendant, 348 Michigan Court. - Ms. McQue relayed this information to Bernadette McDaniell, the Emergency Food Stamp Worker on the defendant’s Emergency Food Stamp application. Ms. McDaniell took application E192 from the defendant. The next day, February 10, 1977, the defendant again returned to the Food Stamp Office in Fort Myers and filed for and signed an application for Emergency Food Stamp Benefits. The application is numbered E450, a certified copy which is attached and made a part hereof as Exhibit B. On this application, the defendant’s address is listed as 633 Michigan Court and the defendant is listed as the head of the household with no dependants. The defendant was issued $50.00 from the cashier. This statement of facts allows the conclusion that application E450 on February 10 (under which $50 worth of food stamps was received) was neither a part of nor in lieu of application E192 for $198 worth of stamps on February 9. The two applications would thereupon be separate and distinct applications in every way and the $198 sought and the $50 received become separate amounts which must be added together. Accordingly, we hold that the stipulated facts established a prima facie case that appellee fraudulently sought or received $248 worth of food stamps, and so the trial court should not have granted the motion to dismiss. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4).

We therefore reverse the order dismissing the information and remand the case for further proceedings consistent herewith.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur. . This was appellee’s second motion to dismiss. The trial court also granted the first motion, but we reversed. State v. Wardlow, 356 So. 2d 901 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).

. Section 409.325 Fraud.—

(5)(a) If the value of the assistance or identification wrongfully received, retained, misappropriated, sought, or used is less than an aggregate value of $200 in any 12 consecutive months, such person is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(b) If the value of the assistance or identification wrongfully received, retained, misappropriated, sought, or used is of an aggregate value of $200 or more in any 12 consecutive months, such person is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.-082, s. 775.083 or s. 775.084.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw