JO ANN BISHOP, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JO ANN BISHOP, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
366 So. 2d 540
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1979)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having reviewed the record and briefs, we find no error in the revocation of probation. We note, however, that the judgment entered on the original charge of receiving stolen property did not recite the material element of knowledge that the property was stolen. Brinson v. State, 345 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). The judgment is hereby amended to show a judgment and conviction of receiving stolen property with knowledge that the property was stolen and the judgment as amended is affirmed.
MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Denesiz Letroy Smith v. State, 880 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…35 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Although the declarant must testify at trial and be available for cross-examination, the declarant is not required to identify the individual in court or confirm that a prior identification was made. Id. at 535; Eans v. State, 366 So. 2d 540, 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The statute has generally been applied to allow testimony concerning an out-of-court identification in a lineup, a photo-pack, or a showup.2 See A.E.B., 818 So. 2d at 535 (showup); Lewis v. State, 777 So. 2d 452, 453-54 (Fla…1 / 2
-
Williams v. State, 662 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…; Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959). To prevent this, Williams rule analysis must be strictly, not loosely, applied. See Drake v. State, 400 So. 2d 1217 (Fla.1981); Eans v. State, 366 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Proper Williams rule evidence is that which possesses “obvious and telling similarities” to the crime charged. Peek v. State, 488 So. 2d 52 (Fla.1986); Eans, 366 So. 2d at 542. Especially when preferred to prove identity, William…
-
Williams v. State, 592 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…n consensual. A second victim’s testimony was admitted to show plan, course of conduct, or common scheme. We find no error in the admission of the collateral crime evidence in this case. See Duckett v. State, 568 So. 2d 891 (Fla.1990; Eans v. State, 366 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Finally, we find appellant’s other issues on appeal to be without merit, and deem any error in this case harmless, in light of the overwhelming evidence against appellant. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986). Accor…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Walker v. State, 345 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)