EVELYN SCOTT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kotsch v. Kotsch, 608 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…on relies for power to create the trust, confers no power of disposition over the father’s property. A power of attorney creates the relationship of principal and agent between the one who gives the power and the one who holds it. Hodges v. Surratt, 366 So. 2d 768, 773 (Fla. 2d DCA1979). Powers of attorney are strictly construed. Falls at Naples, Ltd. v. Barnett Bank of Naples, N.A., 603 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 2d DCA1992) (Altenbernd, J., concurring). They will be held to grant only those powers that are specified…1 / 2
-
Tanner v. Robinson, 411 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…he account she held jointly with Kenneth Robinson. That testimony supports the trial court’s conclusion that Mrs. Childrey intended to transfer the stock and supplies the aid in construing the power of attorney which was absent in Hodges v. Surratt, 366 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 376 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1979) and Johnson v. Fraccacreta, 348 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). The trial court correctly held that Kenneth Robinson’s letter transferring Mrs. Childrey’s stock to his individual account w…1 / 2
-
In re the Est. OF Katherine v. Bell, 573 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…Johnson is precluded, pursuant to the Dead Man’s Statute,1 from testifying as to any statements Bell may have made evidencing her intent to authorize Johnson to appropriate Bell’s property for Johnson’s own use and benefit. Under Hodges v. Surratt, 366 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), the court held the attorney-in-fact for the decedent violated her fiduciary duty by transferring the principal’s property to her husband and appropriating funds in the checking account for her own use absent clear language in the…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)