GLENROYAL PARKWAY COMMUNITY CHURCH, ET AL.,
v.
SECOND ADVENT CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree regarding title and possession of land, finding it controlled by prior precedent and satisfied by the appellees' evidence.
Yes, the decree is affirmed because the case is controlled by prior precedent and the appellees met the requirements stated in a previous case.
“We have considered the record, together with exhibits which have been certified here from the Court below, in the light of the briefs and argument of counsel and we are convinced that the proper disposition of this case is ruled by our opinion and judgment in the case of First Born Church of the Living God et al. v. The First Born Church of the Living God, 156 Fla. 78, 22 So. (2nd) 452, and also that the appellees in the court below met the requirements stated in Partin v. Tucker, 126 Fla. 817, 172 So. 89.”
This quote explains the court's reasoning for its decision, citing precedent and prior case requirements.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellants appealed a final decree from the lower court that adjudicated title and the right of possession of certain lands and tenements to the a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
From a final decree adjudicating the title and right of possession to certain lands and tenements therein described to be in and held by the appellee Second Advent Christian Church of Miami, Florida, the appellants' appeal.
We have considered the record, together with exhibits which have been certified here from the Court below, in the light of the briefs and argument of counsel and we are convinced that the proper disposition of this case is ruled by our opinion and judgment in the case of First Born Church of the Living God et al. v. The First Born Church of the Living God, 156 Fla. 78, 22 So. (2nd) 452, and also that the appellees in the court below met the requirements stated in Partin v. Tucker, 126 Fla. 817, 172 So. 89.
Therefore, the decree appealed from is affirmed.
So ordered.
. CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Virginia Willys Lucom (Formerly Virginia Willys de Landa) v. Atl. Nat'l Bank OF W. Palm Beach, 97 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1957)…property during this period of incompetency. In July of 1953 her illness recurred and she voluntarily returned to the same hospital for further treatment. In what was apparently an attempt to follow the procedure approved in In re Cameron’s Estate, 158 Fla. 91, 28 So. 2d 110, for obtaining the appointment of a guardian of the property in this state •of a Florida resident who is adjudged incompetent by the court of another state while temporarily residing there, a habeas •corpus proceeding was initiated in…
Authorities Cited
- Partin v. Tucker, 126 Fla. 817 (Fla. 1937)
- First Born Church of the Living God v. The First Born Church of the Living God, 156 Fla. 78 (Fla. 1945)