DENNIS KELLERMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Remand For Further Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of a petition for certiorari to review this court’s judgment affirming a conviction of the defendant below [Kellerman v. State, 353 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)], the Supreme Court of Florida, 366 So. 2d 882 entered an order granting certiorari and remanding the cause to this court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla.1978).
Thereafter this court granted a motion of the appellant Kellerman to file a supplemental brief, with leave to the State to file an answering brief, which briefs now have been filed and considered.
On reconsideration of this appeal, we conclude that our decision of affirmance as reported in 353 So. 2d 901 was correct under the law as pronounced in Clark v. State, supra, and our said judgment in this cause is hereby adhered to.
It is so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hayes v. State, 400 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…). A crucial aspect of the testimony challenged herein is that it was not elicited to show defendant’s assertion of his right to remain silent. Kellerman v. State, 353 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (Nathan, J. specially concurring), aff’d on remand, 366 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). No reversible error is shown. It is undisputed that when defendant was sentenced on January 25, 1980 the trial court did not mention retaining jurisdiction. The court did announce retention of jurisdiction three weeks later. The…
Authorities Cited
- Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1978)
- Kellerman v. State, 353 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)