DAVID ALAN ABELSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ability To Pay Court Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
David Alan Abelson appeals the revocation of his probation. The finding of a violation of the condition requiring payment of court costs must be and is stricken from the order of revocation, since appellant was and is indigent and there was no showing of his ability to pay those costs. However, we will not remand for reconsideration of the revocation order. Appellant’s having left the county after his probation supervisor had denied him permission to do so, which was supported by ample evidence, constitutes a substantial violation of his probation and is sufficient to support the revocation order and judgment and sentence. The order and judgment and sentence are therefore affirmed in all other respects. See Coxon v. State, 365 So. 2d 1067 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).
GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and RYDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Angel v. Oberon Inv., N.V., 512 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 1987)…PER CURIAM. We review Oberon Investments v. Angel, Cohen and Rogovin, 492 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), because of direct and express conflict with Amey, Inc. v. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., 367 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied 376 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1979) and Drawdy v. Sapp, 365 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. This case deals with the actions of petitioner in its representation of one Leonard Treister. Respondent bro…
-
Dingle v. Dellinger, 134 So. 3d 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…less it is alleged and proved that the attorney committed some nonnegligent tort such as fraud or theft. See, e.g., Adams v. Chenowith, 349 So. 2d 230, 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). As the court in Amey, Inc. v. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., 367 So. 2d 633, 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), explained: Just as in Adams, there was more than one ‘side’ of the transaction before us. The law firm’s obligation ran to its client. There is no suggestion that the buyer was harmed by any type of fraudulent conduct. It m…
-
Assad v. Mendell, 511 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…y to the Assads. Since these two parties’s interests may very well conflict, Citicorp’s attorney can not be expected to protect the interests of his client as well as those of the Assads’. Cf. Amey, Inc. v. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., 367 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA) (seller’s bank's law firm owed no duty to buyer for the negligent performance of a title search), cert. denied, 376 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1979); Adams v. Chenowith, 349 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (seller’s attorney owed no duty to purchas…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Coxon v. State, 365 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)