ROBERT WILSON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Cuciak v. State, 410 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 1982)
  …the charges, the various methods of discovery under our rules are available to him.” This decision has been followed in Coby v. State, 397 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Suarez v. State, 377 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); [*918] and Cioeta v. State, 367 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Fair play and justice require that a defendant in a probation revocation hearing be entitled to reasonable discovery pursuant to rule 3.220. The framers of rule 3.220 utilized the American Bar Association’s Standards for Crimina…
• Cuciak v. State, 394 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …under our rules are available to him. Although this language was dictum, we cannot disregard it or the various cases dealing with discovery in violation of probation matters. See Suarez v. State, 377 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Cioeta v. State, 367 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); and Sukert v. State, 325 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). With great reluctance, we conclude the language from Hines requires we rule that a defendant is entitled to discovery in violation of probation proceedings. Were we consider…
• Hezekiah Mack v. State, 436 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Fox, 404 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Hudson v. State, 395 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Cioeta v. State, 367 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).…

Authorities Cited

• Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1971)
• Lynch v. State, 293 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1974)
• Simkins Indus., Inc. v. Moreira, 313 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1975)
• Spinkellink v. State, 313 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1975)
• Fletcher Fuller and Abner Fuller v. State, 159 Fla. 200 (Fla. 1947)
• Chaudoin v. State, 118 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)
• Stoddard Pickrell v. State, 301 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
• Vazquez v. State, 350 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
• Holley v. State, 328 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)