PACIFIC NATIONAL EQUITY COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AND RALPH TORELLO, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1979-02-21
No. 77-2126
DOWNEY, C. J., and DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.
367 So. 2d 729 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is affirmed with the exception of the award of $809.99 described as “job connected expenses.”

The contract between the parties provided for payment by one of two methods:

(1) Cost, plus 125%, plus job connected expenses or, if less

(2) $15,000.00 total.

The trial court in this case found the second method to be applicable and with this we have no quarrel. However, the lower court also included $809.99 of job related expenses. This was error. The cause is remanded with direction to the trial court to modify the final judgment by eliminating the award of $809.99 for job connected expenses and as so modified the final judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Peoples GAS Sys., Inc. v. RSH Constructors, Inc., 563 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
    …aximum Cost is $2,025,-900.00, Contractor’s fee is $162,100. Total Guaranteed Maximum Cost plus fee.$2,188,000. Consideration by payment of a percentage of a defined amount is valid under Florida law. See e.g. Pacific Nat. Equity Co. v. Montgomery, 367 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); MacIntyre v. Green’s Pool Service, Inc., 347 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The “specific consideration” required by section 725.06(2) need not be a dollar amount. In a fourth district case interpreting 725.06(2), Westinghouse…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw