LEON STOLLER, APPELLANT,
v.
SAMUEL ZOROVICH, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1979-02-06
No. 78-870
Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.
367 So. 2d 1066 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bland v. Mitchell, 245 So. 2d 47 (Fla.1970), and Lesperance v. Lesperance, 257 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bertrand Obanion v. State, 496 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
    …without more, constitute unavailability for trial under the speedy trial rule. Stuart v. State, 360 So. 2d at 410; Fulk v. State, 417 So. 2d 1121, 1124 (Fla. 6th DCA 1982); Ballard v. Kaney, 397 So. 2d 1042, 1042 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); State v. Bragg, 367 So. 2d 1066, 1067 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). The state also argues that the defendant Obanion was unavailable for trial during the ninety-day speedy trial period [September 18 — December 17, 1984] because (a) he filed an amended witness list, [*981] adding an additi…
  • State v. Hollie, 373 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State v. Bragg, 367 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); State v. Banks, 349 So. 2d 736, 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).…
  • Ballard v. Honorable Frank N. Kaney, 397 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
    …ursuant to a condition of the plea agreement. On the 422nd day after his arrest petitioner moved for a continuance. Mere participation in plea bargaining does not waive speedy trial rights. Stuart v. State, 360 So. 2d 406 (Fla.1978), State v. Bragg, 367 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). See also Mellman v. Rudd, 389 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). When the speedy trial rule period has run the right of the accused to discharge is not affected by acts which might have earlier constituted a waiver.- Muller v. Stat…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw