DAVID LEE EPPS, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Safeco Title Ins. Co. v. Reynolds, 452 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …r in admitting into evidence the parking survey conducted by Mrs. Reynolds and relied upon by the Reynolds’ experts in formulating their opinions. Lee County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Lowe, 344 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), appeal after remand, 367 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). . The properly recorded agreement between the Reynolds’ predecessor in interest and the owners of the adjoining property created a common driveway for the purposes of ingress and egress between their adjoining rear lots wherein…
• Davis v. Gulf Power Corp., 799 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
  …c development ad valorem tax exemption is not applicable because Gulf Power’s plant for generating electricity is not an industrial or manufacturing plant is not supported by the facts or law. See e.g., Lowe v. Lee County Electric Cooperative, Inc., 367 So. 2d 1114, 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) (noting that Florida Power & Light Company “manufactures” and sells electricity as contrasted to a cooperative that purchased and sold electricity); City of Ames v. Iowa State Tax Commission, 246 Iowa 1016, 71 N.W. 2d 15, 22…
• ST. JOE Paper Co. & St. Joseph Land & Dev. Co. v. James, 429 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …been authorized by any statute enacted by the Florida Legislature. That procedures does not, in our opinion, meet the requirement that tax assessors must assess anew each year all taxable property. Lowe v. Lee County Electrical Co-Operative, Inc., 367 So. 2d 1114, 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979): [*710] If the unit method was not an acceptable method for assessing the Co-Operative’s property, then the assessments must fall, because whatever discretion the property appraiser exercised was employed on the wrong premis…