DRUM SERVICE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Bryant v. State, 386 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 1980)
  …. Appellant’s claim on this issue also fails in another respect. The statistics on young adults cover only the year 1978. One year is statistically insignificant under Castaneda. . State v. Nunez, 368 So. 2d 422 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Martin v. State, 367 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). See also Harris v. State, 370 So. 2d 74 (Fla.2d DCA 1979) (a pistol is a firearm); Rogers v. State, 336 So. 2d 1233 (Fla.4th DCA 1976) (a pistol is a firearm); Davis v. State, 215 So. 2d 626 (Fla.3d DCA 1968) (a revolver is a pi…
• State v. Brigham, 694 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …tended results is to be avoided at all costs. “Undoubtedly penal statutes must be strictly construed. However, they must not be construed so strictly as to emasculate the statute and defeat the obvious intention of the legislature.” Martin v. State, 367 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). One need not consult legislative analyses or trace the legislative history of Section 316.193 in order to know what the legislature intended. It quite clearly intended to make unlawful one’s driving a vehicle in Florida with a…
• Smiley v. State, 395 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
  …Fla.Stat. We find no merit to defendant’s arguments. A pistol is clearly a “firearm” within the meaning of Section 790.001(6), and the failure to allege that the .22 caliber pistol was a firearm does not invalidate the Information. Martin v. State, 367 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Harris v. State, 370 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Thorpe v. State, 377 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Since a pistol is a firearm and the defendant was found guilty of attempted first degree murder with a firearm, the trial co…