BOSTON INVESTMENTS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
BERNARD H. HOROWITZ AND SHIRLEY J. HOROWITZ, HIS WIFE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HUMBERTO SUAREZ, FRED A. JONES, JR., JAMES M. RASKIN, TONY PITCH TRAVEL SERVICES, INC., AND AIRKO SERVICE, INC., APPELLEES
BOSTON INVESTMENTS, INC., APPELLANT,
BERNARD H. HOROWITZ AND SHIRLEY J. HOROWITZ, HIS WIFE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HUMBERTO SUAREZ, FRED A. JONES, JR., JAMES M. RASKIN, TONY PITCH TRAVEL SERVICES, INC., AND AIRKO SERVICE, INC., APPELLEES
368 So. 2d 74
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Peacock v. Carver, 315 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); 3 Fla.Jur.2d Appellate Review §§ 347, 348 (1978) and cases cited therein; and 4 Fla.Jur.2d Attorneys At Law § 155 (1978).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Aldana v. Holub, 381 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 1980)…e ex rel. Landis v. Prevatt, 110 Fla. 29, 148 So. 578 (1933). . Cohen v. Johnson, 373 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Thames v. Melvin, 370 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Grossman v. Duncan, 371 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Feinstein v. Brown, 370 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) (on rehearing); Ballard v. Curatolo, 363 [*237] So. 2d 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Cole v. Burrows, 364 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Stanton v. Community Hospital of South…
-
Chenoweth v. William L. Kemp, M.D., 396 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. 1981)…because the panel lost jurisdiction to act. Pursuant to stipulation, the only mediation hearing held within the six-month jurisdictional period was before only one member of the panel. We need not review the decision reached in Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), that the six-month period could not be extended by stipulation, because appellant waived his objection by not contesting the admission of the mediation finding at trial. This is not a “jurisdictional” matter which could not be w…
-
Oyer v. Boyer, 383 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…determinative, we would be required to analyze it in this opinion; however, we are confident that, stipulation or no, it is the final modification order which controls. Attorneys simply cannot stipulate to prolong jurisdiction. Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); International Studio Apartment Association, Inc. v. Sun Holiday Resorts, Inc., 375 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). We have bemoaned this fact before, most recently in the above two cited cases. We agree it is grossly inequitable…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Peacock v. Carver, 315 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)