MINNIE SALZBERG, APPELLANT,

v.

PAULINE EISENBERG ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Theresa Singer Ad Litem for Ann Doe v. Star, 510 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …of his own, has not yet completed discovery, Societe Euro-Suisse, S.A. v. Citizens and Southern International Bank, 394 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), or when objections to interrogatories and a motion to produce are pending. Salzberg v. Eisenberg, 368 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). At the time of its ruling on the motion for summary judgment, the court knew that appellants had scheduled depositions to be completed within thirty days, and knew why the depositions had not previously been scheduled. As early…
• Spradley v. Doctor Michael O. Stick & Hamilton Cnty. Mem'l Hosp., 622 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …uestions, and that appellee objected to the form of the questions and moved to strike them. The trial court improperly granted summary judgment for appellee without ruling on appellee’s objections to the written questions. See Salzberg v. Eisenberg, 368 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA1979) (error to enter summary judgment where objections to interrogatories and motion to produce pending). The questions propounded for Doctors Santana and Taylor represented a reasonable means of discovery necessary to the establishmen…
• S. Cal. Funding, Inc. v. Hutto, 438 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …nd held the stock for security. This does not indicate an indebtedness to Wewahitchka State Bank. Finally, appellants contend that summary judgment was prematurely granted because discovery was incomplete. Appellant relies on Salzberg v. Eisenberg, 368 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1979), in which a final sum [*431] mary judgment was reversed where objections to interrogatories and a motion to produce were pending. “Prior to a determination by the trial court of these objections, it was not possible to ascertain…