JORGE ACOSTA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1979-03-27
No. 79-267
Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
368 So. 2d 959 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the detail of his motion is affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Guridi v. State, 959 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
    …; Guridi v. State, 638 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (table); Guridi v. State, 605 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (table); Guridi v. State, 584 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Guridi v. Levine, 580 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (table); Guridi v. State, 368 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). . Guridi v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 928 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (table); Guridi v. David, 924 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (table); Guridi v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 871 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (table); Guridi v. Singlet…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw