KEITH HOWARD HAMILTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1979-03-14
No. 78-1375
GRIMES, C. J., and BOARDMAN and RYDER, JJ., concur.
369 So. 2d 91 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1979) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Shanklin v. State, 369 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).

GRIMES, C. J., and BOARDMAN and RYDER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lowery v. State, 450 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
    …asonable hypothesis of innocence, has not suggested to this court any such hypothesis. Nor can we, after reviewing the record, imagine any hypothesis of innocence so plausible that the jury could not have rejected it as unreasonable. Brown v. State, 369 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), relied upon by appellant, is factually distinguishable. AFFIRMED. BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw