M. LEE BROWN ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1979-03-27
No. 78-749
Before.HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ.
369 So. 2d 640 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in a suit to quiet title instituted by the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, an agency of the State of Florida Department of Natural Resources, in the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida. We have carefully examined the thorough and detailed final judgment entered by the trial court in this cause together with the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties. In our view, no reversible error has been shown. Accordingly, the final judgment appealed from is affirmed. Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976); Jefferson National Bank at Sunny Isles v. Metropolitan Dade County, 271 So. 2d 207, 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Gars v. Woodard, 214 So. 2d 385, 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Decarion v. Martinez, 537 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …her. Furthermore, inasmuch as the Trustees constitute an agency as that term is defined in section 120.52(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), they are compelled to promulgate rules. See Brown v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, 369 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (review of final judgment in an action to quiet title wherein the Board of Trustees was explicitly noted to be an “agency of the State of Florida Department of Natural Resources”), and Continental Construction Co. v. Board of Trus…
  • Tullier v. Damien Tullier, 98 So. 3d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
    …1991) (“Regarding the issues raised by the former husband, we have carefully examined the record and the trial court’s rather detailed final judgment and find that the evidence adduced below amply supports the judgment.... ”); Brown v. Bd. of Trs., 369 So. 2d 640, 640 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). We will also not second guess [*88] the trial court’s assessment of the witnesses’ credibility in this case. See Porter v. State, 788 So. 2d 917, 923 (Fla.2001) (“We recognize and honor the trial court’s superior vantage poi…
  • Asbury v. State, 588 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Powers v. State, 369 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 381 So. 2d 769 (Fla.1980).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw