EDWARD CHARLES GENTER, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Tobin v. Dannheisser, 372 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …ommenced because a claim was submitted pursuant to the medical liability mediation procedures set forth in Section 768.44, Florida Statutes (1977) within two years of the allegedly negligent treatment by appellee is without merit. Young v. Bramlett, 369 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). However, we agree with'appellant’s contention that a genuine issue of material fact existed which precluded entry of summary judgment with respect to when appellant discovered or, with the exercise of due diligence, should have…
• Shields v. William A. Buchholz, D.D.S., 515 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …in contract for damages because of the death, injury, or monetary loss to any person arising out of any medical, dental, or surgical diagnosis, treatment, or care by any provider of health care. [Emphasis added.] Appellants cite Young v. Bramlett, 369 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert, denied, 379 So. 2d 211 (Fla.1980). In Young, the district court concluded: Although dentists are included within the definition of “health care providers,” Section 768.50(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1977), Section 768.44 doe…
• Lasky v. Hastings, 373 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …PER CURIAM. Reversed on the authority of Young v. Bramlett, 369 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), holding that the medical liability mediation procedures set forth in Section 768.-44, Florida Statutes (1977), are not applicable to alleged malpractice claims against dentists. We note that at the time the trial court entered i…