DONALD R. PETTY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Fredford James Eutsey v. State, 383 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1980)
  …t show- on their face that an extended term is necessary to protect the public from defendant’s further criminal conduct. These findings, however, need not be in writing but may be reported in the transcript of the sentencing hearing. King v. State, 369 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). The findings of the trial court in the present case are more than sufficient to make Eutsey’s appeal of his enhanced sentence meaningful. Eutsey’s contentions that the evidence was insufficient to declare him an habitual offend…
• Ulysses Adams, Jr. v. State, 376 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …rt”; McClain v. State, 356 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), holding that defendant waived any right he had of confrontation and cross-examination by making no objection to the sentencing court’s exclusive reliance on a “rap sheet”; and King v. State, 369 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), similarly following Chukes and requiring “proof to show” a basis for the second-stage finding. But cf. Fry v. State, 359 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), briefly holding that Section 775.084(3)(c) “does not require the contents of…
• Moore v. State, 392 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …r the protection of the public” to sentence the convict to an enhanced period of confinement. Without such a finding the appellate courts have reversed sentences and required new sentencing. Eutsey v. State, 383 So. 2d 219 (Fla.1980); King v. State, 369 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Grey v. State, 362 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Grimmett v. State, 357 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Chukes v. State, 334 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Without going into the basis of our government and a treatise on the…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Freber, 366 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1978)