DOMINIC ZECCOLA, APPELLANT,
v.
RALPH P. EZZO, INDIVIDUALLY AND EZZO & GAREL, P. A., APPELLEES
DOMINIC ZECCOLA, APPELLANT,
RALPH P. EZZO, INDIVIDUALLY AND EZZO & GAREL, P. A., APPELLEES
370 So. 2d 38
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The defendant conclusively established, without genuine issue of material fact, that the plaintiff was on actual notice of the basis of his claim for legal malpractice more than two years before the present action was filed. The summary judgment entered below for the defendant because of the bar of the statute of limitations, Section 95.-ll(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1975), is therefore affirmed. See Robinson v. Sparer, 365 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Steiner v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 364 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); compare Green v. Bartel, 365 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Rosen v. Sparber, 369 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hernandez v. Deputy Ward, 437 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…lar case, then the parties must be given notice. The notice must state the time and place of the hearing and must sufficiently advise the parties of the charge or claim against them. Hinely v. Wilson, 91 Fla. 815, 109 So. 468 (1926); Knapp v. State, 370 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). In the instant case, the trial court denied the appellant’s preliminary injunction and appellee’s notice to dismiss based upon the failure of the parties to appear at the hearing. It is undisputed that neither party received not…
-
Pomerance v. Gragg, 517 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…d 1136, 1138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Peacock v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 432 So. 2d 142, 146 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Howard v. Minnesota Muskies, Inc., 420 So. 2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), rev. denied, 430 So. 2d 451 (Fla.1983); Zeccola v. Ezzo, 370 So. 2d 38, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 381 So. 2d 771 (Fla.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924, 100 S.Ct. 3016, 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980). [*117] The final order of dismissal under review is therefore, in all respects, Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Quiroga v. State, 364 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Green v. Bartel, 365 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Rosen v. Sparber, 369 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Robinson v. Sparer, 365 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)