ALFRED WENK, PETITIONER,

v.

GEORGE P. TSIOTIS, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. U.S.C.P. Co., 515 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …DCA 1976), cert, dismissed, 354 So. 2d 980 (Fla.1977), this court has until recently held the extraordinary writ of certiorari could not be used to obtain review of orders denying motions to dismiss. In Chalfonte Development Corporation v. Beaudoin, 370 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), we said: This case does not warrant the writing of an opinion because the grounds for issuance of the common law writ of cer-tiorari have been discussed in innumerable cases, many of recent vintage. However, in the hope of stem…
• Bowl Am. Fla., Inc. v. Schmidt, 386 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …tentious litigants to delay resolution of cases. I agree that it is best to limit parties to post trial remedies if adequate. See Santini Brothers, Inc., v. Gro [*1205] ver, 338 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Chalfonte Development Corp. v. Beaudoin, 370 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Lynch v. City of Deerfield Beach, 369 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Esler v. Gabinet, 369 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). I concur with the majority opinion that the amendment of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure, Rule 4.2,…
• United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Graham, 404 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …he essential requirements of law which will cause material injury that cannot be rectified on plenary appeal. The rationale for denying certiorari, except under such extreme circumstances, has been set out in Chalfonte Development Corp. v. Beaudoin, 370 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Santini Brothers, Inc. v. Grover, 338 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); and Siegel v. Abramowitz, 309 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). These authorities clearly indicate that the time, trouble, and expense of going through an unnece…