CALVIN E. MURPH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CALVIN E. MURPH, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
370 So. 2d 68
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction, but we remand the case so that the trial court may set aside the orders assessing costs against appellant. Since the court had adjudged appellant to be insolvent, it was not authorized to assess costs against him. § 939.15, Fla.Stat. (1977); Cox v. State, 334 So. 2d 568 (Fla.1976).
GRIMES, C. J„ and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ford Motor Co. v. Hill, 404 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 1981)…General Motors Corp., 20 Cal.3d 725, 575 P. 2d 1162, 144 Cal.Rptr. 380 (1978); Roberts v. May, 41 Colo.App. 82, 583 P. 2d 305 (1978); Smith v. Fiat-Roosevelt Motors, Inc., 556 F. 2d 728 (5th Cir. 1977) (Fla.); Nicolodi v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co., 370 So. 2d 68 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Friend v. General Motors Corp., 118 Ga.App. 763, 165 S.E. 2d 734 (1968), cert. dismissed, 225 Ga. 290, 167 S.E. 2d 926 (1969); Farmer v. International Harvester Co., 97 Idaho 742, 553 P. 2d 1306 (1976); Buehler v. Whalen, 70 Ill.2…
-
Ins. Co. OF N. Am. & John Menninger v. Pasakarnis, 425 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)…he basis of an entire body of products liability law, as established in Florida since Brown v. Kendrick. Ford Motor Co. v. Hill, 404 So. 2d 1049 (Fla.1981); Ford Motor Co. v. Evancho, 327 So. 2d 201 (Fla.1976); Nicolodi v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co., 370 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The most basic principles of evenhandedness preclude the imposition of a different standard of foreseeability depending on which party asserts it.6 4.The objection to judicial recognition of the seat belt defense which I conside…
-
Selfe v. Smith, 397 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…etermine in light of all the circumstances. Id. at 4.7. Obviously, the manufacturer’s duty to make a vehicle reasonably crashworthy is based substantially on a duty to anticipate someone’s negligence. See Nicolodi v. Harley Davidson Motor Co., Inc., 370 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). . Prosser calls attention to decisions, of which this court’s Brown v. Kendrick is an exemplar, recognizing as causative that contributory negligence which contributes to producing the injury-event, but not that species of negli…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- COX v. State, 334 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1976)