PENINSULAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
WILLIAM T. CHAFIN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
PENINSULAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
WILLIAM T. CHAFIN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
102 Fla. 1005
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 137 So. 521
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of *1006the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no reversible error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Brown, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Sylvester v. Young Tindall, 154 Fla. 663 (Fla. 1944)…mposing it, were parties. As to the scope of habeas corpus proceedings, see, in addition to the cases already cited, the following: Lehman v. Sawyer, 106 Fla. 396, 143 So. 310;Jones v. Cook, 146 Fla. 253, 200 So. 856; French v. Turner, 103 Fla. 425, 137 So. 521; Ex parte Lewis, 101 Fla. 624, 135 So. 147; Quigley v. State, 99 Fla. 933, 127 So. 898; White v. Penton, 92 Fla. 837, 110 So. 533; Hardee v. Brown, 56 Fla. 377, 47 So. 835; Bronk v. State, 43 Fla. 461, 31 So. 248; Ex parte Prince, 27 Fla. 196, 9 So.…
-
Lehman v. Sawyer, 106 Fla. 396 (Fla. 1932)…presented, upon writ of error or otherwise, the question of whether or not the possession of fish of a smaller size than that specified in the Act, when lawfully acquired in another State, is forbidden by the Act.” In the case of French v. Turner, 137 So. 521, this court held, in an opinion by MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BUFORD, that where writ of habeas corpus issues and it appears on the hearing that the indictment is valid on its face, the writ should be quashed although the petitioner may have a valid defense…
-
Shelton v. Coleman, 136 Fla. 625 (Fla. 1939)…of error or otherwise, the question of whether or not the pos'session of fish ó I a-smaller size than that specified in the Act, when lawfully acquired in another State, is forbidden by the Act.” [*632] In the case of French v. Turner, 103 Fla. 425, 137 So. 521, this Court, speaking through Mr. Chief Justice Buford, held that where the indictment is valid on its face, the writ of habeas corpus should be quashed, although the petitioner may have a valid defense on account of the running of the statute of li…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence