MAX PENN

v.

NATHAN GINSBURG AND HELEN GINSBURG, HIS WIFE

Citator

Cited By

• Thomas v. State, 748 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 1999)
  …is to assist the jury in analyzing and applying the evidence presented at trial. See Rankin v. State, 143 So. 2d 193, 195 (Fla.1962). A motion for a jury view may be granted if it appears that a useful purpose would be served. See Ferguson v. State, 158 Fla. 345, 349-50, 28 So. 2d 427, 431 (1946). However, such a determination is left to the discretion of the trial judge and there is a presumption of correctness as to his rulings absent a demonstration to the contrary. See Bundy v. State, 471 So. 2d 9, 20 (…
• Lavado v. State, 219 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed upon authority of Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So. 2d 264; Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 517; Ray v. State, 1947, 159 Fla. 101, 31 So. 2d 156; Ferguson v. State, 1946, 158 Fla. 345, 28 So. 2d 427; and McCollum v. State, Fla. 1954, 74 So. 2d 74, 47 A.L.R.2d 1218. HOBSON, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and McNULTY, JJ., concur.…
• Kemp v. State, 271 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
  …consider the motion and rule thereon prior to the commencement of the second trial to have constituted reversible error, particularly when we concur in the position of the trial judge that there was no illegal search and seizure. Ferguson v. State, 158 Fla. 345, 28 So. 2d 427; Law v. State, Fla.App.1967, 204 So. 2d 741; Howard v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So. 2d 83; Dickenson v. State, Fla.App.1972, 261 So. 2d 561; § 924.-33, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. We have examined the second point and find it to be without mer…

Authorities Cited

• Berlin v. Jacobs, 156 Fla. 773 (Fla. 1945)