VICTOR POSNER, APPELLANT,

v.

RICHARD S. FLINK, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Arlee Jackson and Mugge Rivers, 433 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …al, obviating the necessity for preservation, see, e.g., Easton v. Bradford, 390 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), rev. dismissed, 399 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 1981); Southwestern Insurance Co. v. Stanton, 390 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Bickford v. Wall, 371 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 381 So. 2d 764 (Fla.1980). Thus, in Shank v. Fassoulas, the jury found the defendant negligent, but awarded no damages to the six-year-old plaintiff who was struck by the defendant’s car. The plaintiff’s motion for…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Sw. Ins. Co. v. Stanton, 390 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …Other points on appeal and cross-appeal have been considered and found to be without merit. Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell, 384 So. 2d 145 (Fla.1980); Castlewood International Corp. v. LaFleur, 322 So. 2d 520 (Fla.1975); Bickford v. Wall, 371 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied 381 So. 2d 764 (Fla.1980). Accordingly, the order granting plaintiffs’ Motion for New Trial is affirmed with directions that the new trial be limited to the issue of damages and that the total damages found on the s…

Authorities Cited

• Posner v. Flink, 167 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)