IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. BUSH, AS COMMISSIONER OF THE HERKIMER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, STATE OF NEW YORK, ON BEHALF OF DEBORAH AUSTIN, APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Florida circuit court dismissed a child support enforcement case filed under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Law because documents were transmitted through the Department of Legal Affairs rather than directly from the New York court. The appellate court reversed, holding that the statutory procedure authorized transmission through the state information agency.
The court held that the procedure used—transmitting documents through the Department of Legal Affairs as the designated state information agency—was authorized by statute and complied with Section 88.141 in conjunction with Section 88.181, Florida Statutes. The case should not have been dismissed.
[1] A trial court may not dismiss a Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Law action solely because documents were forwarded through a state information agency rather tha…
[2] When interpreting statutory provisions, courts must consider the statutes in conjunction with related provisions to ascertain the legislative intent.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“When the court of this state, acting as a responding state, receives from the court of an initiating state the aforesaid copies, it shall docket the cause . . . .”
Section 88.181 provision that the trial court relied upon to dismiss; requires docketing when documents are received from initiating state's court
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSuit was filed in New York seeking to enforce child support obligations against Kenneth Austin, allegedly a Florida resident, for two minor children r…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement Of Support Act cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a final order of dismissal entered on the trial court’s own motion. We reverse.
Suit was filed in New York under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Law to require Kenneth Austin, allegedly a Florida resident, to pay child support for his two minor children who live in New York. After the petition and supporting documents were filed in the New York •court, that court sent those documents to the Department of Legal Affairs in Florida and the Department of Legal Affairs forwarded the documents to the Child Support Enforcement Section of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, which filed the documents with the circuit court of Putnam County. The circuit court, on its own motion, entered a final order dismissing the case on the grounds that Section 88.181, Florida Statutes (1977), provides, “When the court of this state, acting as a responding state, receives from the court of an initiating state the aforesaid copies, it shall docket the cause . . . .” The trial court interpreted that section to require that the New York court send the documents directly to the Florida courts and dismissed the case because of the failure to comply with that provision. Jurisdiction was never obtained over Kenneth Austin and he is not a party to this appeal.
Though Section 88.181 does set forth procedures for when documents are received from the court of the initiating state, that provision must be read in conjunction with Section 88.141, Florida Statutes (1977), which sets forth a procedure other than one requiring the trial court in one state to send documents directly to the trial court in the other state. That section provides, in relevant part, “If the name and address of [the receiving] court is unknown and the responding state has an information agency comparable to that established in the initiating state [the initiating state] shall cause such copies to be transmitted to the state information agency or other proper official of the responding state, with the request that it forward them to the proper court, and that the court of the responding state acknowledge their receipt to the court of the initiating state.”
The Florida Statutes specifically designates the Department of Legal Affairs as the “state information agency.” Section 88.171, Florida Statutes (1977).
Considering the various provisions of Chapter 88 as a whole, we hold that the procedure used for filing the case in the circuit court of Putnam County was authorized by statute and that the case should not have been dismissed. Accordingly, we REVERSE and order that the cause be reinstated.
MILLS, Acting C. J., and ROBERT P. SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.