MELODY ROSENBERG, PETITIONER,

v.

MICHAEL ROSENBERG, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Colucci v. Colucci, 392 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …nts of alimony and child support were insufficient. Tested by the reasonable person standard enunciated by Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980), however, there was no abuse of discretion in these determinations. Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 371 So. 2d 672 (Fla.1979); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1976). Finally, the appellant earnestly argues that the failure to make a lump sum award-of either the husband’s interest in the house, its cash equivalent, or…
• Blum v. Blum, 382 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …in the wife’s name to the husband. The result was that Mrs. Blum had two Mercedes and Dr. Blum, who had paid or was required to pay for both of them, owned none. . E. g., Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, (Fla.1980); Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 371 So. 2d 672 (Fla.1979), adopting 352 So. 2d 867 (Fla. App.) (Hubbart, J., dissenting); Smith v. Smith, 378 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). . Indeed, the amounts awarded seem also to be beyond even the claimed needs of Mrs. Blum and her children. See note 1, supr…
• Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …eriodic alimony.7 See also, Genoe v. Genoe, 373 So. 2d 940 (Fla.4th DCA 1979). The amount, character, and duration of those payments are matters initially for the discretion of the trial court.8 Canakaris v. Canakaris, supra; Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 371 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1979); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976). [*1273] The husband’s other appellate complaints require little discussion. The trial judge’s finding that Rosen made a $25,000 gift to his then-wife…

Authorities Cited

• Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 352 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
• Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 372 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)