WILLIAM AUGUSTUS CLARK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1979-05-29
No. 78-1794
Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
371 So. 2d 1060 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by defendant from a denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to CrPR 3.850. Defendant urges reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw plea of guilty to possession of heroin.

We have carefully considered all of defendant’s contentions in the light of the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated, Williams v. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla.1975); Bremser v. State, 322 So. 2d 642 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw