ROBERT FREDERICK ADAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
DARLENE ROSE ADAMS, APPELLEE
ROBERT FREDERICK ADAMS, APPELLANT,
DARLENE ROSE ADAMS, APPELLEE
371 So. 2d 1068
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13, 16-17 (Fla.1976); Caidin v. Caidin, 367 So. 2d 248 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Koeppel v. Koeppel, 351 So. 2d 766 (Fla.3d.DCA 1977); Pfohl v. Pfohl, 345 So. 2d 371, 375, 378 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Cann v. Cann, 334 So. 2d 325, 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Linares v. Linares, 292 So. 2d 63 (Fla.3d DCA 1974). See and compare; Meridith v. Meridith, 366 So. 2d 425 (Fla.1978); Cummings v. Cummings, 330 So. 2d 134 (Fla.1976); Fraser v. Fraser, 368 So. 2d 97 (Fla.3d DCA 1979).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Green v. Green, 390 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 61.13(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1978); Osteryoung v. Leibowitz, 371 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).…
-
Denyse Ann Griss v. Griss, 526 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…debate on H.B. 487). .In 1978, the Legislature enacted Chapter 78-5, Laws of Florida, amending Section 61.13, Florida Statutes. The amendment allowed the court, only as part of a dissolution proceeding between the parents, Osteryoung v. Leibowitz, 371 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), to award rights of visitation to grandparents if it was deemed to be in the child’s best interests. However, the grandparents had no legal standing to appear or intervene and were not required to be made parties. Shuler v. Shuler…1 / 2
-
Ferrell v. Ruege, 397 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…parents are found to be unfit, a judge cannot award to a grandmother the right of visitation with a child except as provided in Section 61.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes. See Shuler v. Shuler, 371 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Osteryoung v. Leibowitz, 371 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1979); Behn v. Timmons, 345 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). We take no issue with that principle of law. However, the order appealed from did not establish the right of visitation in the grandmother but rather modified that right. The…
Authorities Cited (11 total)
- Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)
- Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1977)
- Cummings v. Cummings, 330 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1976)
- Tedford J. Cann v. Margery M. Cann, 334 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
- Pfohl v. Pfohl, 345 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Oaklander v. Jules Oaklander, 351 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Caidin v. Caidin, 367 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Meridith v. Meridith, 366 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1978)
- In re the Est. of Philip Siegel, 366 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1978)
- Lush v. State, 292 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)