JAMES ANDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES ANDERSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
371 So. 2d 1073
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.
ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.
Dissent
ANSTEAD, Judge,
dissenting:
The appellant was convicted of grand larceny. The only defense attempted to be offered was by the testimony of an expert witness that the market value of the goods in question was less than $100.00. The trial court had previously granted the motion of the appellant to appoint an expert to appraise the value of the goods stolen. However, at trial the court refused to allow the expert to testify. I think this was reversible error.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Durbin v. State, 385 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…llant may or may not be a mentally disordered sex offender. We believe that the reports were sufficient to require the trial court to conduct a hearing when requested to do so by the defendant claiming such status under the law. Donaldson v. State, 371 So. 2d 1073 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Hendricks v. State, 360 So. 2d 1119 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). Both reports detailed the defendant’s extensive history of deviant behavior and psychiatric problems including his previous hospitalization as a mentally disordered sex offend…