JEANETTE WILLIAMS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probable Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and dispensed with oral argument pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320. After careful consideration of the briefs and record, we have determined that conflict was dispelled by Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla.1978), thereby leaving this Court without jurisdiction. Accordingly, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Linder v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 342 So. 2d 474 (Fla.1977); Florida East Coast Railway v. Rouse, 194 So. 2d 260 (Fla.), conformed to, 195 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Weedman v. Sunland Roller Rink, Inc., 349 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
It is so ordered.
ENGLAND, C. J., and BOYD, SUND-BERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Palmes v. State, 397 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1981)…v. State, 78 Fla. 672, 84 So. 373 (1919); Sims v. State, 59 Fla. 38, 52 So. 198 (1910); Bunn v. State, 363 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So. 2d 1373 (Fla.1979); Williams v. State, 353 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), cert. dismissed, 372 So. 2d 64 (Fla.1979). It is conceivable that a confession, freely and voluntarily given and therefore admissible, may be untrue. Therefore the defendant must be allowed to tell the jury why he made it. It has been said that the application of this rule requi…
-
Donovan v. State, 417 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1982)…final determination of the voluntariness of the statement.7 United States v. Martinez, 577 F. 2d 960 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 914, 99 S.Ct. 288, 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978); Williams v. State, 353 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. dismissed, 372 So. 2d 64 (Fla.1979). Since Donovan did not exercise his right to remain silent, Bennett does not apply and the testimony of Deputy Smith was properly admitted for the purpose of determining the voluntariness of the statement. We accepted jurisdiction based…
-
State v. Prieto, 439 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…e. We agree with the defendant that generally a prosecutor is prohibited from commenting upon the defendant’s right to remain silent. However, the present case is similar to Williams v. State, 353 So. 2d 588, 590 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. dismissed, 372 So. 2d 64 (Fla.1979), wherein this court stated: From the record, we find that the prosecutor was seeking to introduce a statement of the defendant into evidence, and it was necessary to first show that she had been properly warned of her constitutional righ…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1978)
- Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co. v. Rouse, 194 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1966)
- Schreiber Express, Inc. v. Mayo, 342 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 1977)
- Levert Linder and Emma Jean Linder v. Combustion Eng'g, Inc., 342 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 1977)
- Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co. v. Rouse, 195 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
- Weedman v. Sunland Roller Rink, Inc., 349 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)