JAMES WALTER HILL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1979-06-19
No. 78-2086
Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.
372 So. 2d 191 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Jenkins v. State, 317 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Shapiro v. State, 345 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Thompson v. State, 368 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); United States v. Dearden, 546 F. 2d 622 (5th Cir. 1977).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Balarin v. Allstate Ins. Co., 481 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
    …motorist carriers as a party to this suit and stood on their complaint brought against only one of their underinsured motorist carriers. See State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Glass, 421 So. 2d 759, 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); O’Donnell v. Chamberlain, 372 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); § 682.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1983). Reversed and remanded.…
  • Pensacola Junior Coll. v. Montgomery, 539 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …pany mandatory but only permissive. It is also clear from the Shingleton decision that an insurance company is not an indispensable party during the trial on the merits on the issue of the liability of the insured. See also O’Donnell v. Chamberlain, 372 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). In fact, the type of hearing that was subsequently held following the trial on the merits in the instant case was expressly recognized in Shin-gleton when the supreme court observed that ... [i]t is not altogether improbable tha…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw