HARRY JONES, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Frivolous Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal from the order revoking the defendant’s probations and the subsequent judgments and sentences is wholly frivolous. The order of revocation is modified by deleting the reference.to the defendant’s failure to pay the costs of supervision. See Depson v. State, 363 So. 2d 43, 44 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The order, judgments and sentences are otherwise entirely affirmed.
Affirmed as modified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
van Johnson v. State, 375 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…judgment and sentence is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted. The order of revocation is modified by deleting the reference to the defendant’s failure to pay the costs of supervision. Jones v. State, 372 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Depson v. State, 363 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The order, judgment and sentence, and sentence under review are otherwise entirely affirmed. Affirmed as modified.…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Depson v. State, 363 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)