IN RE FLORIDA EVIDENCE CODE

Fla. | 1979-06-28
No. 57115
ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
372 So. 2d 1369 Florida Supreme Court (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 67 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court adopted the Florida Evidence Code, enacted by the legislature in 1976, as temporary procedural rules of court effective July 1, 1979. The Court asserted its constitutional authority to adopt evidentiary rules to the extent they are procedural, while recognizing that some evidence rules may be substantive law within the legislature's sole domain.


Holding

The Florida Supreme Court has jurisdiction under Article V, Section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution to adopt the evidence code as temporary procedural rules effective July 1, 1979. The Court adopted the procedural provisions of the code and superseded all conflicting prior rules of evidence derived from case law or express court rules.


Headnotes

[1] The Florida Supreme Court has jurisdiction to adopt rules of practice and procedure.

[2] Rules of evidence may be substantive law, the sole responsibility of the legislature, or procedural, the responsibility of the Supreme Court.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“This Court has jurisdiction to adopt rules of practice and procedure under the provisions of article V, section 2(a), Florida Constitution.”

Establishes the constitutional basis for the Court's authority to adopt the evidence code as procedural rules.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Florida legislature unanimously adopted the Florida Evidence Code in 1976, with an original effective date of July 1, 1977. The effective date was…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This Court has jurisdiction to adopt rules of practice and procedure under the provisions of article V, section 2(a), Florida Constitution.

The Florida Evidence Code was adopted unanimously by the legislature in the 1976 regular session.1 The act originally was intended to take effect July 1, 1977; the effective date of the code was delayed, however, until July 1, 1979.2

It is generally recognized that the present rules of evidence are derived from multiple sources, specifically, case opinions of this Court, the rules of this Court, and statutes enacted by the legislature. Rules of evidence may in some instances be substantive law and, therefore, the sole responsibility of the legislature. In other instances, evidentiary rules may be procedural and the responsibility of this Court.

To avoid multiple appeals and confusion in the operation of the courts caused by assertions that portions of the evidence code are procedural and, therefore, unconstitutional because they had not been adopted by this Court under its rule-making authority, the Court hereby adopts temporarily the provisions of the evidence code as enacted by chapter 76-237, Laws of Florida, and subsequently amended by chapters 77-77, 77-174, 78-361, and 78-379, Laws of Florida, to the extent that they are procedural, as rules of this Court effective from and after 12:01 a. m., July 1, 1979. These rules shall govern all proceedings within their scope subsequent to that date, and all present rules of evidence established by case law or express rules of court are hereby superseded to the extent they are in conflict-with the code. See In re Clarification of Florida Rules of Practice and Procedure, 281 So. 2d 204 (Fla.1973).

Our approval and adoption of the evidence code is transitional and temporary in nature, and we request The Florida Bar, the Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, and other interested parties to file any appropriate suggestions or objections on or before October 1, 1979, directed to specific rules of evidence contained in the code and stating (1) the basis why the challenged rule is procedural rather than substantive, and (2) why the rule is inappropriate in its present form.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. . Ch. 76-237, Laws of Fla. Several technical and stylistic changes have been made. Ch. 77-77, 77-174, 78-361, Laws of Fla. . Chapter 76-237, section 8, Laws of Florida, provided an effective date of July 1, 1977. The effective date was changed to July 1, 1978, by chapter 77-77, section 1; to January 1, 1979, by chapter 78-361, section 22; and to July 1, 1979, by chapter 78-379, section 1, Laws of Florida.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (33 total)

  • Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1992)
    …e with rule 3.190(j) would be admissible under the procedural rule. Moreover, procedural rules, such as rule 3.190(j), that act as rules of evidence were superseded to the extent they are in conflict with the Evidence Code. In re Fla. Evidence Code, 372 So. 2d 1369 (Fla.), clarified, 376 So. 2d 1161 (Fla.1979). This Court's pre-evidence code holding in State v. James, 402 So. 2d 1169 (Fla.1981), does not mandate a contrary conclusion. James dealt exclusively with admission of discovery depositions under Flori…
  • Ramirez v. State, 651 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 1995)
    …irst, the trial judge must determine whether such expert testimony will assist the jury in understanding the evidence or in determining a fact in issue. § 90.702, Fla.Stat. (1993) (adopted by the Florida Supreme Court in In re Florida Evidence Code, 372 So. 2d 1369 (Fla.1979)). Second, the trial judge must decide whether the expert’s testimony is based on a scientific principle or discovery that is “sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.” Frye v.…
  • Sikes v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 429 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
    …a.1974). . Legislative history of the two codes discloses that the Florida Evidence Code was enacted in 1976 by the Florida Legislature and approved in 1979 by the Florida Supreme Court. See Ch. 76-237, Laws of Florida; In re Florida Evidence Code, 372 So. 2d 1369 (Fla.1979). The Federal Evidence Code was initially approved by the United States Supreme Court in 1972, and later enacted by Congress in 1975, thereby predating the Florida Code. See Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates, 56 F.…

Previewing 3 of 33 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw