LLOYD V. WATKINS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
R. H. NOEL, CHIEF OF POLICE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1931-09-29
Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur., Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
102 Fla. 1041 Florida Supreme Court (1931) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 137 So. 523
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Whitfield, P.J.

Whitfield, P.J.

— The final order remanding the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings brought here on writ of error is reversed upon the principles announced in Roach v. Ephren, 82 Fla. 523, 90 So. 609; Dusenburg v. Chesney, 97 Fla. 468, 121 So. 567; 37 C. J. 200, sec. 53. This ease is in principle clearly unlike Penin. Cas. Co. v. State, 68 Fla. 411, 67 So. 165.

Reversed.

Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Tapping v. McIntosh, 104 Fla. 715 (Fla. 1932)
    …of suretyship made by licensed surety companies in the business of suretyship for hire. See People ex rel. Kasson v. Rose, 174 Ill. 310, 51 N. E. 246. I think the demurrer should have been overruled on the authority of Perry Hotel Co. v. Courtney, 102 Fla. 1041, 136 Sou. Rep. 691; Hazen v. Cobb, 96 Fla. 151, 117 Sou. Rep. 853, and other eases which hold that sustaining a demurrer to a declaration not wholly failing to state a cause of action constitutes error. Judgment reversed. Buford, C.J., and Whitfie…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw