DOGAN INANC, M.D., PETITIONER,

v.

GEORGE K. SCHRECKENGOST, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Thomas v. State, 531 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1988)
  …BARKETT, Justice. We have for review State v. Thomas, 508 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), based on express and direct conflict with K.W. v. State, 468 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), and Preston v. State, 373 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So. 2d 1203 (Fla.1980). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, [*709] § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We approve the decision below. Petitioner was arrested after a confidential informant advised police that petitioner had commi…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Cantrell v. State, 405 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
  …ssessed were a simple screwdriver, gloves and a flashlight. As in Foster, possession of these otherwise innocent items was unlawful only because the evidence established that these items were in fact used to commit a burglary. See, Preston v. State, 373 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). [*988] Since the decision in Foster, the legislature has enacted the single transaction statute, Section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (Supp.1976), which provides: Whoever, in the course of one criminal transaction or episode, co…
• Frame v. State, 388 So. 2d 1381 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
  …leged burglary tools were a slide hammer and bolt cutters. The state presented no evidence that these were not “innocent items” and, therefore, it had to show not only possession, but use or attempted use of them as burglary tools. Preston v. State, 373 So. 2d 451 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); see State v. Thomas, 362 So. 2d 1348 (Fla.1978). The state, however, failed to demonstrate this. Consequently, the trial court erred in denying Frame’s motion to suppress the tools. The trial judge refused to suppress the firearm…

Authorities Cited

• Hewitt v. Henry Caffee, M.D., 368 So. 2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)