CHARLOTTE MESSAGE CENTER, INC. PETITIONER,

v.

PAULA F. HAWKINS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Silver v. Levinson, 648 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …defendant to in personam jurisdiction based on a single, isolated transaction by the nonresident defendant does not necessarily offend due process. Lacy v. Force V Corporation, 403 So. 2d 1050, 1054 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); see also Godfrey v. Neumann, 373 So. 2d 920 (Fla.1979). Doe does not hold otherwise. The analysis must focus on the nature of the act. When dealing with isolated acts of a defendant, rather than centering on continuous economic activity within the state, a key focus is the quality and nature…
• Martin Acquadro, M.D. v. Bergeron, 851 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 2003)
  …defendant to in personam jurisdiction based on a single, isolated transaction by the nonresident defendant does not necessarily offend due process. Lacy v. Force V Corporation, 403 So. 2d 1050, 1054 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); see also Godfrey v. Neumann, 373 So. 2d 920 (Fla.1979). Doe does not hold otherwise. The analysis must focus on the nature of the act. When dealing with isolated acts of a defendant, rather than centering on continuous economic activity within the state, a key focus is the quality and nature…
• Int'l Harvester Co. v. Mann, 460 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …concern. Ap-pellee also correctly states that the com [*582] mission of a tort within Florida by a nonresident is a sufficient “minimum contact” with Florida to justify personal jurisdiction in light of the federal constitution. Godfrey v. Neumann, 373 So. 2d 920 (Fla.1979). The Florida courts have consistently held that a plaintiff seeking to assert long-arm jurisdiction over a non-resident must allege in his complaint sufficient facts to fall within the language of Section 48.-193, Florida Statutes. Wynn…