JOHN H. MORGAN, APPELLANT,

v.

JANET H. MORGAN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Bias v. Warner Bias, 374 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …r, who maintained the child in that state in violation of a court-recognized stipulation.1 We find no abuse of discretion in the ruling on the merits. See Smith v. Davis, 147 So. 2d 177, 179-180 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962). Affirmed. . Cf. Baird v. Baird, 374 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); filed this same date, where the appellee mother was not in violation of any court order when she initially brought her child into the State of Florida and where the Florida trial court’s subsequent actions were discretionary unde…
• Walt v. Walt, 574 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …he child in view of the child’s physical residence in Florida and his prior contacts with the state. Yet, it is clearly shown in this record that a Florida court could have properly assumed to exercise jurisdiction on this basis. See Baird v. Baird, 374 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). We hold, based on these deficiencies in the Mississippi proceeding as demonstrated on this record, that the Florida court erred in concluding that the Mississippi court had exercised its jurisdiction in accordance with the requi…
• LEE v. Meeks, 592 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …ng, the Florida trial court would be well within its power under the UCCJA to rule that the Tennessee court did not exercise its jurisdiction in accordance with the requirements of the UCCJA. A contrary holding would not comport with Baird v. Baird, 374 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). C. Appellants argue that the Tennessee court did make a finding that it was in the child’s best interest to have custody changed from his mother to the paternal grandparents. There is, however, no explicit ruling to that effect…

Authorities Cited

• Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1977)
• McANESPIE v. McANESPIE, 200 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
• Demaso v. Demaso, 345 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
• Corvison v. Corvison, 362 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)