GUY EOFF

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• McKinley Freeman v. Blackburn, 92 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 1957)
  …give permission to petitioner to appeal and that through omission or inadvertence the said order was not recorded, nor does it show that permission was given to take the appeal as the statute requires. State ex rel. Brister v. Brister, 158 Fla. 662, 29 So. 2d 699; Wright v. State, 32 Fla. 472, 14 So. 43; State ex rel. Wilson v. Quigg, 154 Fla. 348, 17 So. 2d 697. The purpose of a nunc pro tunc order is to supply an omission in the record of action previously done which omission was made through inadvertence…
• State of Fla. ex rel. John Thomas Callahan, Jr. v. Michell, 170 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1964)
  …titioner now seeks certiorari [*291] review by reason of a sub silentio conflict “on the same point of law”, Section 4(2), Article V, of the Constitution, F.S.A., between the denial and the cases of State v. Quigg, 17 So. 2d 698; Brister v. Brister, 29 So. 2d 699; and Griffith v. State ex rel. Crownover, Fla.App.1963, 152 So. 2d 818. Section 79.11, F.S.A., is a remanent of the comprehensive habeas corpus procedure act of 1879, Chapter 3129, Laws of Florida, Section 10 of which act provided that: “The judge…
• Griffith v. State of Fla. on the relation of William D. Crownover, 152 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
  …under section 79.11, F.S.A., relating to appeals from habeas corpus orders, that the judge shall grant permission for the appeal. Cited by the State in support of this procedure are the cases of State ex rel. Brister v. Brister, 1947, 158 Fla. 662, 29 So. 2d 699; Freeman v. Blackburn, Fla., 1957, 92 So. 2d 262; Shenk v. Shenk, Fla. App., 1961, 126 So. 2d 286, cert. denied Fla., 138 So. 2d 340. The State then urges that since the judge did not grant the permission in the order appealed from, it was necessary…